Message-ID: <3AC298D9.6090509@austin.rr.com>
That is the one. works well.
Sadanand Warrier wrote:
>
>> is it really PCMCIA? the only PCMCIA 3com cards supported (i believe) are
>
> 3c589, 3c562
>
>> and some minor variants. normally 3C905 is a PCI card. i'll see if i can
>
> find a 905C
>
>> card here that's not in use, to test it.
>>
>
>
> My mistake . It is a PCI card. To be exact
>
> 3COM 3C905C-TX 10/100 Etherlink IIIB PCI Ethernet adapter OEM,
> Twisted Pair(RJ-45) Only. With network wake-up feature.
>
> Would this cause a problem.
>
> S
From 9fans@cse.psu.edu Thu Mar 29 08:26:37 2001
From: 9fans@cse.psu.edu (Michael H. Collins)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:26:37 GMT
Subject: [9fans] Booting Plan9
References: <20010327094451.8952E199DC@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <3AC298A1.1080001@austin.rr.com>
I have sucessfully used many 3c905c cards. The work no p. Don't even
have to spec the io and irq.
forsyth@vitanuova.com wrote:
>>
normally 3C905 is a PCI card. i'll see if i can find a 905C
> card here that's not in use, to test it.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
>
> [9fans] Booting Plan9
> Date:
>
> Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:25:42 GMT
> To:
>
> cse.psu.edu!9fans
>
>
> Hi
> I'm trying to install Plan9 on a new PC. I've got 3 partitions. Windows
> ME hogs the first two and I'm trying to install Plan 9 on the third
> partition (its about 30 GB).
> The installation of Plan 9 goes through quite successfully. I have no
> problems with the VGA (ATI Xpert 98) and unpack proceeds well.
> Finally at bootsetup I created a boot floppy and I also opted to boot
> from the disk. This does not work at all because the Windows ME idea of a
> boot record may be different from Windows 98 or NT.
> However when I try to boot from the boot floppy it hangs after it says
> its booting the image from sdC0. The message I get is panic: kernel iunlock.
> I've looked at the code in code in /sys/src/boot/pc and I cannot find this
> message though there seem to be iunlocks associated with ethernet drivers.
> I have a 3COM PCMCIA 3C905C lan card. Would this cause a problem? The
> CPU is a 1.2 Gig Athlon.
>
> S
> Part 1.1
>
> Content-Type:
>
> text/plain
> Content-Encoding:
>
> 7bit
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2.1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2
>
> Content-Type:
>
> message/rfc822
From 9fans@cse.psu.edu Thu Mar 29 08:48:38 2001
From: 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:48:38 +0100
Subject: [9fans] Booting Plan9
Message-ID: <20010329085059.02C66199F3@mail.cse.psu.edu>
>>I have sucessfully used many 3c905c cards. The work no p. Don't even
>>have to spec the io and irq.
yes, it works with the drivers from 14 october.
From 9fans@cse.psu.edu Thu Mar 29 13:44:56 2001
From: 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:44:56 -0500
Subject: [9fans] Booting Plan9
Message-ID: <20010329134458.8DD0C199F1@mail.cse.psu.edu>
On Thu Mar 29 03:40:35 EST 2001, mhtexcollins@austin.rr.com wrote:
> I have sucessfully used many 3c905c cards. The work no p. Don't even
> have to spec the io and irq.
>
and
On Thu Mar 29 03:51:29 EST 2001, forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >>I have sucessfully used many 3c905c cards. The work no p. Don't even
> >>have to spec the io and irq.
>
> yes, it works with the drivers from 14 october.
>
I don't think this is quite true. When we looked at it Jean
Mehat and I found the 905C seems to need a Tx/Rx reset when it
comes up with power-management enabled internally and because
of my laziness there are paths through the initialisation code
where no reset will be done; it all depends on how the card is
internally configured and the result of the autonegotiation.
The missing Tx/Rx reset will apear in the next update (I don't
know how it was missed out when the other 905C chnages went in
last October) but the fix is to add
txrxreset(port);
after
if(did == 0x9055 || did == 0x9200){
At least, that was our limited understanding of the problem.
--jim
From 9fans@cse.psu.edu Thu Mar 29 15:10:03 2001
From: 9fans@cse.psu.edu (9fans@cse.psu.edu)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:10:03 +0100
Subject: [9fans] Online-Umfrage
Message-ID: <200103291409.QAA18197@post.webmailer.de>
RWB Finanz

|
|
Wir
würden uns freuen, wenn Sie an unserer Umfrage über Vermögens-anlagen
teilnehmen. Wir bedanken uns bei den ersten fünfzig ehrlichen Antworten
mit einer Flasche Heuchelberg Sekt Jahrgang 2000, die wir
Ihnen frei Haus zukommen lassen.
Hier
geht´s zur Umfrage
|
 |
|
|
Wenn Sie keine E-Mails mehr von uns wünschen, schicken Sie uns eine E-Mail.
Sie werden dann aus der Empfänger-Liste gestrichen.
Falls Ihr E-Mail-Programm diese Funktion nicht unterstützt, schicken Sie bitte eine E-Mail an
rob_rwb-finanz@verbrauchertest-online.de
mit dem Betreff 29595FCF-244D-11D5-A33300500444A708
Dies ist ein unbeaufsichtigtes Postfach.